Kashmir Conflict: Examining India’s Diplomatic Stance and
Regional Impact
The scenic Kashmir region has endured continuous strife since the 1947 subcontinent division, creating
profound hardships for local inhabitants while territorial disputes between Pakistan and India persist
unresolved. This region is completely disregarded and ignored, treated as if it doesn’t even exist in this
world. Its rich natural resources and breathtaking beauty, has become a coveted prize for external
forces seeking to exert control. Although amidst the geopolitical maneuvering, the voice of kashmiris
themselves are consistently marginalized , and their right to self determination is disregarded, this
regions value is exploited, but its people are denied a say in their own future.
India’s diplomatic approach regarding Kashmir reveals concerning patterns of narrative manipulation
that neglected ground realities. While portraying itself as combating terrorism, evidence suggests India’s
policies have contributed to regional instability. This fundamental contradiction has consistently
undermined diplomatic initiatives toward peaceful resolution. Kashmiris themselves have borne the
heaviest burden throughout this protracted conflict. Documented casualties under Indian administration
have raised serious human rights concerns among international observers. Yet India routinely redirects
accountability by attributing violence to external forces, particularly implicating Pakistan without
substantial evidence.
Negotiations between the two nuclear powers have repeatedly faltered due to India’s wavering
commitment to dialogue. Peace efforts are frequently derailed by conveniently timed violent incidents,
raising legitimate questions about underlying motivations. The recent Pahalgam attack exemplifies this
troubling cycle, immediately triggering inflammatory Indian media coverage that heightened tensions
rather than promoting thoughtful investigation. Baseless accusation are leveled against “ The Resistance
front, with no credible evidence to support the claims and its clear that this isn’t linked to Pakistan, as
Pakistan itself has long been a victim of terrorism.
This situation is further complicated by India’s domestic political landscape, where anti-Pakistan
sentiment serves as a powerful rallying point. This creates a problematic environment where pursuing
genuine diplomatic solutions becomes politically hazardous for Indian leadership, perpetuating a cycle
of hardening positions on both sides. Kashmir’s predominantly Muslim population faces particular
vulnerability in this environment. Reports indicate targeted discrimination, adding religious dimensions
to an already complex geopolitical struggle.
Perhaps most concerning is the muted international response despite the nuclear capabilities of both
nations making this one of the world’s most dangerous flashpoints. The limited engagement from global
powers and multilateral institutions represents a significant failure of international diplomacy. Achieving
lasting stability requires acknowledging the multifaceted nature of this conflict, including the legitimate
concerns of Kashmir’s population. Until oversimplified narratives are abandoned, meaningful diplomatic
progress remains unlikely. This situation demands renewed international engagement focused on
human security rather than national prestige or historical grievances